AARP hosts election debate in toss up district
>
Archive
-
PWW Print Edition Archive
-
2002 Editions
-
Oct 19, 2002
Author: George Fishman
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 10/19/02 00:00
WATERBURY, Conn. – The AARP held a debate between Jim Maloney (D) and Nancy Johnson (R) here Sept. 30. The forum focused on senior citizens issues, mainly a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, upholding and strengthening Social Security and health care. Nearly 400 senior citizens attended. Senior citizens’ voting turnout rate is usually higher than the general population’s.
Maloney and Johnson are both incumbents running in the reorganized 5th CD. The race is seen as important nationally because a Maloney victory here can help defeat the thin Republican majority in the House of Representatives. The National Committee for an Effective Congress rates the outcome of the Maloney/Johnson race a “toss-up.”
In the debate, Maloney exposed Johnson’s pro-corporate stands, especially on Medicare and Social Security. Maloney exposed that Johnson’s claim to support a prescription drug benefit was actually the discredited Republican bill, which turned funds over to HMO’s and insurance companies. Johnson also said she was favorable towards seniors opening 401K investment funds with Social Security money, a step towards privatizing and dismantling Social Security.
The applause by the seniors in the audience was clearly sympathetic to Maloney’s stand.
Based on the incumbents’ voting records the following scorecards have been issued: Association of Retired Americans (ARA, AFL-CIO): Maloney 90 percent, Johnson 0 percent; NAACP: Maloney 78 percent, Johnson 38 percent. American Federation of Teachers/National Education Association: Maloney 100 percent, Johnson 78 percent.
AARP, which represents 10 million members, graded Johnson’s record “unsatisfactory” to senior citizens.
The author can be reached at pww@pww.org
Posting guidelines: User posts and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments, such as anti-working class, sexist, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Communist, homophobic or other offensive material will be removed from the site. In addition, discussion threads that appear to be confined to two people, do not add to the discussion and/or are repetitive may also be deleted. Further, entries that are not verified by e-mail will not be posted in order to prevent spam postings (e.g. comments that contain links to unrelated web sites). Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site.
blog comments powered by Disqus